(+84) 9 61 57 18 18

Decree 46/2024/ND-CP amending industrial property administrative sanctions

With the innovations in the provisions of the Vietnam Intellectual Property Law 2022, as guided by Decree 65/2023/ND-CP, regulations on sanctions for administrative violations in the field of industrial property being regulated by Decree 99/2013/ND-CP (amended and supplemented by Decree 126/2021/ND-CP) also needs to be updated to be more suitable. Recently, on 04/05/2024, the Government issued Decree 46/2024/ND-CP amending industrial property administrative sanctions in Vietnam. This Decree will take effect from 01/07/2024 with notable points presented by Viet An Law in the article below.

Decree 46/2024/ND-CP amending industrial property administrative sanctions

Regulations on the subject of sanctions are dependent units of legal entities

Previously, Decree 99/2013/ND-CP referred to the Law on Handling Administrative Violations 2012 when determining subjects subject to sanctions where the subject infringing was a dependent unit of legal entities such as branches, representative offices, and business locations. However, this Law does not yet regulate this issue. That will only be specifically guided until 2021 in Decree 118/2021/ND-CP. Specifically, the new regulations are amended as follows:

Case Subject was punished Fines
Dependent units commit administrative violations within the scope and time limit authorized by legal entities or organizations or under the direction, administration, assignment, or approval of legal entities or organizations. Entities (enterprises) with dependent units Fines apply to organizations for activities carried out by branches, representative offices, or business locations of that legal entity or organization.
The dependent unit commits an administrative violation outside the scope or term of authorization. Branches, representative offices, business locations Penalties apply to organizations for activities carried out by branches, representative offices, and business locations.

Additional remedial measures

Forced revocation of domain names

The penalty regulations only apply measures to change information or return domain names, clearly revealing inadequacies in practice when the IP owners of infringing activities on domain names (typically infringing on trademarks contained in domain names), are all famous names and have their official domain name system. Thus, returning or changing information about the trademark owner is not necessary. Meanwhile, the urgent and necessary revocation of domain names to avoid damage to trademark owners has not been regulated. Therefore, the supplement by Decree 46/2024/ND-CP related to this measure in Article 3.3(a) of Decree 99/2013/ND-CP is reasonable.

Forced distribution or non-commercial use

Also in Article 3, previously this measure applied to raw materials, materials, and means mainly used for production, business, and infringing goods, then under the new Decree it only applies to infringed goods.

Forced change of business name

For this remedial measure, the new decree requires the agency handling administrative violations to send the issued decision to the relevant parties and the Business Registration Agency where the enterprise’s headquarters is located to create a more proactive mechanism in coordinating the implementation of sanctioning decisions.

The measure of revocation of the Enterprise Registration Certificate is no longer applicable, instead, the enterprise will be forced to enforce the name change in case of failure to carry out procedures within 60 days from the effective date of the sanction decision as prescribed by law. The enforcement notice between the sanctioning agency and Business Registration Agency will be made within 10 days from the expiry of the time limit for the implementation of the decision and transmitted to the enterprise by a notice requesting an explanation report within the next 05 days from the date of receipt of the enforcement notice.

Additional enforcement of remedial measures

Decree 46/2024/ND-CP has supplemented regulations on the implementation of several remedial measures in Clauses 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, Article 31 of Decree 99/2013/ND-CP To resolve the current situation of stagnation in the implementation of penalty decisions as follows:

Applied remedial measure Implementation guide after expiration
Forced removal from Vietnamese territory or forced re-export of material evidence and means of administrative violations Forced destruction of evidence and means of administrative violations.
Forced distribution or non-commercial use of counterfeit goods Coercive implementation
Forced addition of instructions on industrial property Coercive implementation
Forced to return papers and documents that have been erased or altered to falsify the content Forcibly return it to the competent authority or person that issued it
Forced to pay compensation equivalent to the price of transfer of use rights Forced payment to the owner

Supplement Article 3a on measures to prevent domain name infringement

This provision is specifically designed to supplement the handling of industrial property administrative violations to meet the reality of intellectual property violations related to domain names in the digital era. The regulations are specified as follows:

  • Preventive measures: temporarily detain the domain name
  • Subject of request: Competent entities handle administrative violations
  • Implementing entity: Ministry of Information and Communications (Vietnam Internet Center)
  • Coordinating role of domain name registrar: providing professional opinions, maintaining the status quo of domain names before taking measures to temporarily confiscate evidence and means used to commit administrative violations.

Faced with the situation of illegally using domain names containing protected industrial property objects (mainly trademarks), it is essential to prevent infringement promptly before going deeper into the sanction decision-making process.

Update principles for determining the value of infringing goods

Decree 65/2023/ND-CP detailing several articles and measures to implement the Intellectual Property Law on industrial property has been promulgated and stipulated that this principle applies specifically to industry property in Article 95. Therefore, Clause 3, Article 4 of Decree 99/2023/ND-CP also needs to be updated to replace the general rules specified in the previous Law on Handling of Administrative Violations.

Specifically, according to the new regulations, the value of infringing goods is determined by the infringement handling agency at the time the infringement occurs and is based on the following bases in the following order of priority : (i) Listed price; (ii) Actual sale price; (iii) Aggregate costs of the infringing goods, if not yet in circulated; (iv) Purchase price.

Supplementing sanction regulations related to trademark licensing

Licensing a trademark or transferring the right to use a trademark is a common activity in the field of intellectual property, but there are no specific sanctions for violations of regulations governing this activity. Accordingly, Article 6 of Decree 99/2013/ND-CP has been updated to constitute a violation at Point c, Clause 1. The new regulations point out that non-compliance with the form of license contracts (newly added regulations) and with regulations on instructions for goods produced under trademark license contracts (retained original regulations in the old decree) is a violation of regulations governing the transfer of trademark use rights.

The fine for the above behavior is 10,000,000 VND to 20,000,000 VND for individuals, and double the fine for organizations. At the same time, the violator must also remedy by:

  • Adding instructions (for the act of not writing instructions); or
  • Eliminate the violating element (with wrong instructions).

Supplementing regulations on sanctioning unfair competition activities related to domain names

As stipulated in Article 130.1(d) of the Intellectual Property Law 2005, amended and supplemented in 2022, the act of “Possessing, using domain names identical with or confusingly similar to protected trademarks or trade names of others, or geographical indications without having the right to use for profits or malicious intents” is an unfair competition in industrial property has just been amended according to the Intellectual Property Law 2022.

Accordingly, the regulations on administrative sanctions in Decree 99/2013/ND-CP only mention the act of ” registering, seizing the right to use or using domain names” under the previous IP Law. Therefore, Decree 46/2024/ND-CP has amended the provisions in Article 14.16(a) on constituting the above acts to comply with the provisions of the newly promulgated Intellectual Property Law. The act of appropriation has a broader scope and covers actual acts of infringement of industrial property rights related to domain names than the old regulations because in many cases the subject of the infringement is not the person registering the domain name. At the same time, the new regulations only require proof of the violator’s “bad faith” to be sufficient, such as in cases of trademark speculation, and are not limited to the purpose of “possessing domain name” according to previous regulations.

Additional grounds for verification

Article 22 of Decree 99/2013/ND-CP previously only stipulated subjects with the right to request violation handling without mentioning other objective factors. Regulations in Decree 46/2024/ND-CP clearly define the grounds for verifying violations and only one of the above grounds is needed to be able to impose actual sanctions, including:

  • There is a processing request from the right holders;
  • There are results of inspection of signs of violations;
  • Proposals from organizations and individuals that suffer or are likely to suffer damage due to unfair competition practices;
  • Information provided by third parties that detect infringement.

Receive and process requests for handling administrative violations

Article 25 of Decree 46/2024/ND-CP requires that the application must clearly state the name of the agency receiving the application in case it is sent to multiple agencies with the same authority. At the same time, the authority will belong to the agency that accepts the application earliest, placing the obligation of refusing to accept the application on the remaining agencies according to Clause 1, Article 28 of the newly added Decree.

New deadline regulations

The deadlines for receiving and processing new applications established in Decree 46/2024/ND-CP include:

  • Time limit for instructing the applicant to apply to the correct competent authority: 10 days from the date of receipt.
  • Time limit for the party requested to handle a violation to provide information, evidence, and explanation at the request of the agency handling the application: 30 days from the date of request.

Handle when complaints and disputes arise

Complaints and disputes arise after the request is received, but there are no regulations on handling procedures. Therefore, Decree 46/2024/ND-CP has added Clause 4 in Article 25 regarding this process, specifically, the application receiving agency will perform the following steps:

  • Stop processing the application according to point a, clause 2, Article 28.
  • Require relevant parties to carry out procedures to request the resolution of complaints, denunciations, and disputes at the competent authority within 10 days from the date of recording the dispute arising;
  • Coordinate with the National Office of Intellectual Property to clarify the legal status of industrial property rights that are subject to complaints, denunciations, and disputes within no more than 10 days from the date of receipt of the request;
  • Within 30 days from the date of receipt of the National Office of Intellectual Property’s written response, the agency receiving the request is responsible for responding to whether or not to proceed with the request to handle infringement of industrial property rights of the person requesting the sanction.

In case the application has not been accepted, the receiving agency will refuse to accept the application according to the provisions of Article 28 of Decree 99/2013/ND-CP, newly amended and supplemented to be compatible with the new Decree.

Accordingly, this regulation has created a coordination mechanism to promptly resolve requests of intellectual property rights holders for ongoing acts of infringement in the event of related complaints and disputes arising, which will contribute to significantly reducing the shifting of responsibility and stagnation in the handling of administrative violations by state agencies.

Modify the case of stopping the processing of violations handling requests

Decree 46/2024/ND-CP has added at Point d, Clause 2, Article 28 of Decree 99/2013/ND-CP cases that must stop processing in addition to cases where disputes arise and there is not enough basis or there is a notice of withdrawal of the request that is:

“d) The parties agree to resolve the case according to the provisions of Clause 2, Article 27 of the Decree”.

Accordingly, this measure must ensure: (i) conformity with legal regulations on intellectual property, (ii) not affect the rights and interests of third parties, consumers and society, then the agency receiving the new application has a basis to record and stop handling the request.

At the same time, the Decree also expands the regulations on continuing to process applications despite notice of withdrawal from the requesting subject as previously stipulated in Clause 3, Article 28. Specifically, instead of only applying to acts of trademark and geographical indications counterfeiting, the new regulations apply to all acts of infringement with the condition that “there is a basis to determine that the act of infringement is administrative violations “.

Stipulate the authorization mechanism to request infringement handling

The authorization mechanism was stipulated in Article 23 of the previous Decree 99/2013/ND-CP but has been regulated in detail according to the provisions of Decree 46/2024/ND-CP. Accordingly, industrial property rights holders can authorize (i) the head of their representative office, branch, or agent or (ii) an industrial property representative in Vietnam to request infringement processing. However, it should be noted that the scope of authorization only includes filing applications, and does not include representative exchanges with competent authorities.

Legal services of Industrial Property Representative – Viet An Law

  • Trademark research, patent translation, and trademark protection consulting;
  • Consulting on updating legal regulations related to intellectual property protection for businesses;
  • Consulting on conditions for registering intellectual property protection for trademarks, industrial designs, inventions, layout designs, geographical indications, and copyrights.
  • Representing clients to carry out procedures to register for intellectual property protection at competent authorities in Vietnam.
  • Consulting on registration of intellectual property protection internationally and in other countries.
  • Representative for supplementing and amending registration applications, protection titles, and opposing intellectual property registration;
  • Consulting and representing customers in handling intellectual property rights infringement;
  • Brand management consulting for newly established companies in Vietnam.

Above are some notes of Decree 46/2024/ND-CP amending industrial property administrative sanctions. If you need to use Viet An Law’s intellectual property legal consulting services, please contact us via the information below for direct support.

Related Acticle

Decree 14/2024/ND-CP amending regulations on foreign trade management

Decree 14/2024/ND-CP amending regulations on foreign trade management

On February 7, 2024, the Government issued Decree 14/2024/ND-CP amending regulations on foreign trade management, with a focus on revising the procedures for granting establishment licenses for representative offices in…
Industrial design registration in Singapore

Industrial design registration in Singapore

Industrial design registration requires compliance with specific criteria. Nowadays, in the context of the increasingly developing market economy, there are many new inventions and inventions created to keep up with…
Trademark registration in Poland

Trademark registration in Poland

Trademark registration in Poland is governed by a comprehensive legal framework overseen by the Patent Office. Poland emerged as a dynamic and rapidly growing economy in Central Europe, attracting the…
Trademark registration in Qatar

Trademark registration in Qatar

Trademark registration in Qatar requires careful navigation of the country’s legal framework and administrative procedures. Located on the Arabian Peninsula, Qatar possesses a favorable geographical location, easy access to important…
Trademark licensing in Vietnam

Trademark licensing in Vietnam

Trademark owners who want to expand their production scale can engage in to transfer of the right to use a trademark to other businesses. According to the provisions of the…


Hanoi Head-office

#3rd Floor, 125 Hoang Ngan, Hoang Ngan Plaza, Trung Hoa, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam


Ho Chi Minh city office

Room 04.68 vs 04.70, 4th Floor, River Gate Residence, 151 – 155 Ben Van Don Street, District 4, HCM, Viet Nam



English speaking: (+84) 9 61 57 18 18 - Lawyer Dong Van Thuc ( Alex) (Zalo, Viber, Whatsapp)

Vietnamese speaking: (+84) 9 61 37 18 18 - Dr. Lawyer Do Thi Thu Ha (Zalo, Viber, Whatsapp)