Against trademark counterfeit is essential to understand the legal measures and strategies available to protect intellectual property rights. Using a logo, slogan, or packaging design that is identical to a well-known brand can expose a business to serious legal consequences due to intellectual property disputes. Trademark counterfeit is not only a violation of the law but also an infringement of the intellectual property rights of others. To protect intellectual property rights for trademarks and ways to deal with counterfeiting, Viet An Law will analyze regulations to against trademark counterfeit in Vietnam in the article below.
Table of contents
Trademark counterfeit is an act of intellectual property infringement, specifically the infringement of rights to a registered trademark. This act is often carried out by copying, imitating, or illegally using another person’s trademark, causing confusion to consumers about the origin of goods and services. Clause 1, Article 129 of the Law on Intellectual Property 2005, as amended and supplemented, specifically stipulates acts considered to be infringement of rights to trademarks and counterfeit trademark goods as prescribed in Clause 2, Article 213 without the permission of the trademark owner:
Acts of infringement of trademark rights will be punished under Article 11 of Decree 99/2013/ND-CP, amended and supplemented by Clause 10, Article 1, Clause 3, Article 2 of Decree 46/2024/ND-CP, and Clause 10, Article 1 of Decree 126/2021/ND-CP, specifically as follows:
Violation acts | Value of goods and services | Penalty level |
Trading; offering for sale; transporting, including transiting; storing; displaying for sale goods or services that infringe upon trademark rights
Ordering, assigning work, and hiring others to perform the above acts |
Up to 3.000.000 VND | Caution or fine from 500,000 – 2,000,000 VND |
Over 3.000.000 – 5.000.000 VND | 2.000.000 – 4.000.000 VND | |
Over 5.000.000 – 10.000.000 VND | 4.000.000 – 8.000.000 VND | |
Over 10.000.000 – 20.000.000 VND | 8.000.000 – 15.000.000 VND | |
Over 20.000.000 – 40.000.000 VND | 15.000.000 – 25.000.000 VND | |
Over 40.000.000 – 70.000.000 VND | 25.000.000 – 40.000.000 VND | |
Over 70.000.000 – 100.000.000 VND | 40.000.000 – 60.000.000 VND | |
Over 100.000.000 – 200.000.000 VND | 60.000.000 – 80.000.000 VND | |
Over 200.000.000 – 300.000.000 VND | 80.000.000 – 110.000.000 VND | |
Over 300.000.000 – 400.000.000 VND | 110.000.000 – 150.000.000 VND | |
Over 400.000.000 – 500.000.000 VND | 150.000.000 – 200.000.000 VND | |
Over 500.000.000 VND | 200.000.000 – 250.000.000 VND | |
The above actions | There is no basis to determine the value of infringing goods and services. | 10.000.000 – 20.000.000 VND |
· Production includes the design, manufacture, processing, assembly, processing, and packaging of goods bearing signs of trademark infringement.
· Printing, pasting, attaching, casting, embossing, or otherwise using stamps, labels, or other items bearing signs of trademark infringement on goods · Importing goods bearing signs of trademark infringement Order, assign work, hire others to perform the above acts |
Fine equal to 1,2 times the fine prescribed from Clause 1 to Clause 12 of this Article but not exceeding VND 250,000,000 | |
Use signs that infringe trademark rights on signs, business transaction documents, business vehicles, service vehicles, and product packaging. | 10.000.000 – 20.000.000 VND |
In addition, for acts of infringement of trademark rights listed in Section 1 where the value of infringing goods and services is over 100,000,000 VND and violations in Section 2, individuals and organizations shall also be subject to an additional penalty of partial or total suspension of production and trading of infringing goods and services for 01 to 03 months.
Remedies are prescribed in Clause 17, Article 11 of Decree 99/2013/ND-CP, amended and supplemented by Point d, Clause 10, Article 1 of Decree 126/2021/ND-CP, and Point c, Point d, Clause 10, Article 1 of Decree 46/2024/ND-CP, specifically as follows:
Intellectual property rights holders have the right to apply the measures prescribed in Clause 1, Article 198 of the Law on Intellectual Property 2005, amended and supplemented, to protect their intellectual property rights, including:
In addition, intellectual property rights holders may authorize other organizations or individuals to apply the above measures to protect their intellectual property rights.
A typical example of trademark infringement is the case of Saigon Beer Corporation Vietnam, represented by Mr. Le Dinh Trung, who counterfeited the trademarks “BIA SAIGON” and “BIA SAIGON, dragon image” which are protected and qualified as famous trademarks of Saigon Beer – Alcohol – Beverage Joint Stock Company (SABECO).
Accordingly, Mr. Trung applied for industrial design registration and the trademark Saigon Vietnam Beer at the National Office of Intellectual Property. Although the National Office of Intellectual Property has not yet issued a certificate of trademark registration, Saigon Vietnam Beer Company has ordered the BiVa beer production facility (Ba Ria City) to produce canned beer products under the brand name “Bia Saigon Vietnam” for sale on the market on a commercial scale. After being discovered and handled by the Department of Market Management, on September 9, 2020, the Investigation Police Agency of Ba Ria – Vung Tau Province Police initiated a case and prosecuted the defendant. On November 30, 2020, the National Office of Intellectual Property refused to issue a certificate of registration of the trademark Saigon Vietnam Beer. On March 16, 2023, after two years of prosecuting the case, the People’s Court of Ba Ria – Vung Tau province sentenced Saigon Beer Vietnam Group Joint Stock Company and its representative to a fine of VND 3.7 billion for the crime of infringing industrial property rights.
The case is an important lesson in protecting trademark rights and combating unfair competition in the field of intellectual property. Mr. Le Dinh Trung, the defendant in this case, is a long-time employee at SABECO, the company whose trademark was infringed. Not to mention that intellectual property assets are business secrets, Mr. Trung’s resignation and brand plagiarism for unfair competition is a loophole in human resource management and labor contracts between SABECO and its employees.
Above is all the information about how to against trademark counterfeit in Vietnam. If you need advice on regulations related to intellectual property, please contact Viet An Law for the best support.
Hanoi Head-office
#3rd Floor, 125 Hoang Ngan, Hoang Ngan Plaza, Trung Hoa, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam
Ho Chi Minh city office
Room 04.68 vs 04.70, 4th Floor, River Gate Residence, 151 – 155 Ben Van Don Street, District 4, HCM, Viet Nam
SPEAK TO OUR LAWYER
English speaking: (+84) 9 61 57 18 18 - Lawyer Dong Van Thuc ( Alex) (Zalo, Viber, Whatsapp)
Vietnamese speaking: (+84) 9 61 37 18 18 - Dr. Lawyer Do Thi Thu Ha (Zalo, Viber, Whatsapp)